Tagged: Buddha's language
Pages with this tag
Karpik - The Buddha taught in Pali - A working hypothesis (2019)
1This paper challenges the scholarly consensus that the Buddha taught in multiple dialects like Māgadhī, a theory known as the Multiple Oral Transmission Theory (MOTT). Instead, it argues for a Single Oral Transmission Theory (SOTT), proposing that the Buddha used a single standard language, which is the language we now call Pali. The author contends that oral translation of the vast canon was impractical, unnecessary due to the mutual intelligibility of Indo-Aryan dialects, and explicitly discouraged by the suttas' emphasis on word-for-word transmission. The traditional identification of the Buddha's language as Māgadhī is based on a misreading of the term *Māgadhabhāsā* in the commentaries, which actually defined it as *Ariyaka* (Indo-Aryan), a pan-regional term. The paper posits that Pali was a natural, pre-existing standard language based on a western dialect, a precursor to the widespread Epigraphic Prakrit, and that the Buddha adopted this sociolect of the educated to ensure a fixed, albeit phonetically fluid, transmission of his teachings across different regions. This working hypothesis refutes the MOTT by explaining dialectal variants in Pali as natural artifacts of a single transmission rather than remnants of a translation, thereby aligning with the Theravada tradition's claim.
Levman - The language the Buddha spoke (2019)
2Bryan Levman argues that the Buddha spoke not Pāli as we know it, but an earlier, related vernacular or *koine* that differed in word form, morphology, and sometimes meaning. Evidence for this earlier linguistic layer is uncovered by applying comparative historical linguistics to the various Pāli recensions and parallel transmissions in other Prakrits, such as Gāndhārī. This method reveals that many variant readings and semantic ambiguities in the canon can be traced back to a common ancestral form in the *koine* which had undergone significant phonetic simplification, such as the weakening of intervocalic consonants into glides or the reduction of various aspirated stops to a simple aspirate. Later redactors, transmitting the teachings into their own dialects, reinterpreted these simplified sounds, resulting in the multiple cognate forms found today, a process further complicated by influences from prestigious northwestern dialects and the assimilation of non-Aryan words. Levman concludes that this linguistic evolution is consistent with the Buddhist doctrine of impermanence and supports the Buddha's historicity.